It's the Environment, Stupid
Heh, yeah, forget it. Thirty seconds on Google told me where Quentin is now: on the Alliance list.
Okay. Issue one for me, this and every election, is the environment. Everything else is just rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. Any sensible and responsible government should be planning right now for the consequences of global warming and peak oil, if only because those who are prepared have a head start economically. Denmark makes £45m a year from exporting wind technologies they bought from Britain.
When it comes to being green, New Zealand is rather like the US when it comes to democracy. We talk big, as a substitute for actually doing. Auckland has the same rate of public transport usage as Los Angeles. Trouble is, as a country, we've grown up in plenty as far as natural resources, so we're conditioned to waste. Because our population is low by international standards, we're only just starting to hit the real problems that stem from excessive consumption. We've had plenty of opportunity to learn from overseas experience, and we're not doing it.
And of course, I live in Christchurch, and sometimes I go outside at night in winter. In fact, these days you don't even have to go outside to chew the smog. Tackling air pollution has basically been left to local government, and here that means the council whining because the 'new' protocols mean they may have to shut down the coal-fired furnace they use to heat their own offices. Yes, coal fires are banned, but only for private individuals.
One thing Christchurch does have right is curbside recycling. But the thing is, strategies like that really have to be implemented nationally, not just patchwork by large urban areas than happen to currently have a lefty council. And there's no point in picking the stuff up if you don't encourage businesses that actually USE it.
In a way I'm kind of interested by the intellectual exercise of trying to work out what is going to happen to New Zealand as a result of global warming. I mean, ignoring the people still faffing around saying, We don't know enough, and what we want to do about that is not find out anything. We do know. We know what's happening, we know what causes it, the only surprise has been how fast it's happening. Trying to plan for the future by debating first principles of global warming is a bit like trying to plan a circumnavigation of the globe with the Flat Earth Society.
Wellington. Higher sea levels and increased precipitation, snow as well as rain. That means more days like we've had occasionally over the last couple of years, when you can't actually get into or out of Wellington because of the weather. It's time, right now, to start thinking about what happens if you can't actually use both the road and rail lines into Wellington that run right along the shore. Is it time for sea walls?
Energy efficiency. It's kind of interesting watching the debate on the 'energy crisis' in New Zealand, because it goes like this. Well, people should conserve energy. Oh, absolutely they should, now here's what we want to do when they don't. And that's it for conservation. Last year, it seemed to be awfully important to slow down the housing market. Surely that would have been the perfect time for the government to say okay, every new house built has to have solar hot water, and has to reach a certain standard of energy efficiency. Yes, that would make new houses more expensive. Wasn't that the point? This year's British White Paper on alternative energy said, among other things, that if you put solar panels on every roof in Britain (previously entirely wasted space), they'd become net producers of energy. It would satisfy all of Britain's energy needs and then some, entirely cleanly. Why yes, it would be expensive. All energy solutions are expensive. Yes, I'm aware solar panels have to be replaced every decade or so. I don't know how many solar panels you could make for the price of a hydro dam, but I'm thinking it's somewhere around 'fuckloads'.
There's only one way to change human behaviour when it comes to the environment. It's rather like smoking: we know what we do is bad, for us, for the people around us, just in general, but we like it, so we're not going to stop. What it takes is a combination of financial incentives and disincentives, (if you're going to increase the price of petrol, then you have to have public transport alternatives in place and subsidies for hybrid cars, for instance), and government regulation.
And we need to have centralised planning (Commies! Commies commies commies!) in place to deal with the forseeable consequences of environmental change. New Zealand, for instance, is going to be one of the countries hit with environmental refugees, as Pacific Islands start literally disappearing. When your whole country is half a mile wide and less than a metre above sea level and the tide comes two metres further up the beach than it did last year, global warming is more than an interesting theory.
This'll be followed at some stage by 'why I'm reluctant to vote for the Greens'.
Okay. Issue one for me, this and every election, is the environment. Everything else is just rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. Any sensible and responsible government should be planning right now for the consequences of global warming and peak oil, if only because those who are prepared have a head start economically. Denmark makes £45m a year from exporting wind technologies they bought from Britain.
When it comes to being green, New Zealand is rather like the US when it comes to democracy. We talk big, as a substitute for actually doing. Auckland has the same rate of public transport usage as Los Angeles. Trouble is, as a country, we've grown up in plenty as far as natural resources, so we're conditioned to waste. Because our population is low by international standards, we're only just starting to hit the real problems that stem from excessive consumption. We've had plenty of opportunity to learn from overseas experience, and we're not doing it.
And of course, I live in Christchurch, and sometimes I go outside at night in winter. In fact, these days you don't even have to go outside to chew the smog. Tackling air pollution has basically been left to local government, and here that means the council whining because the 'new' protocols mean they may have to shut down the coal-fired furnace they use to heat their own offices. Yes, coal fires are banned, but only for private individuals.
One thing Christchurch does have right is curbside recycling. But the thing is, strategies like that really have to be implemented nationally, not just patchwork by large urban areas than happen to currently have a lefty council. And there's no point in picking the stuff up if you don't encourage businesses that actually USE it.
In a way I'm kind of interested by the intellectual exercise of trying to work out what is going to happen to New Zealand as a result of global warming. I mean, ignoring the people still faffing around saying, We don't know enough, and what we want to do about that is not find out anything. We do know. We know what's happening, we know what causes it, the only surprise has been how fast it's happening. Trying to plan for the future by debating first principles of global warming is a bit like trying to plan a circumnavigation of the globe with the Flat Earth Society.
Wellington. Higher sea levels and increased precipitation, snow as well as rain. That means more days like we've had occasionally over the last couple of years, when you can't actually get into or out of Wellington because of the weather. It's time, right now, to start thinking about what happens if you can't actually use both the road and rail lines into Wellington that run right along the shore. Is it time for sea walls?
Energy efficiency. It's kind of interesting watching the debate on the 'energy crisis' in New Zealand, because it goes like this. Well, people should conserve energy. Oh, absolutely they should, now here's what we want to do when they don't. And that's it for conservation. Last year, it seemed to be awfully important to slow down the housing market. Surely that would have been the perfect time for the government to say okay, every new house built has to have solar hot water, and has to reach a certain standard of energy efficiency. Yes, that would make new houses more expensive. Wasn't that the point? This year's British White Paper on alternative energy said, among other things, that if you put solar panels on every roof in Britain (previously entirely wasted space), they'd become net producers of energy. It would satisfy all of Britain's energy needs and then some, entirely cleanly. Why yes, it would be expensive. All energy solutions are expensive. Yes, I'm aware solar panels have to be replaced every decade or so. I don't know how many solar panels you could make for the price of a hydro dam, but I'm thinking it's somewhere around 'fuckloads'.
There's only one way to change human behaviour when it comes to the environment. It's rather like smoking: we know what we do is bad, for us, for the people around us, just in general, but we like it, so we're not going to stop. What it takes is a combination of financial incentives and disincentives, (if you're going to increase the price of petrol, then you have to have public transport alternatives in place and subsidies for hybrid cars, for instance), and government regulation.
And we need to have centralised planning (Commies! Commies commies commies!) in place to deal with the forseeable consequences of environmental change. New Zealand, for instance, is going to be one of the countries hit with environmental refugees, as Pacific Islands start literally disappearing. When your whole country is half a mile wide and less than a metre above sea level and the tide comes two metres further up the beach than it did last year, global warming is more than an interesting theory.
This'll be followed at some stage by 'why I'm reluctant to vote for the Greens'.
